CPI for Democratic Candidates U.S. Senate, U.S. House

This CPI scores the Louisiana Democratic candidates in the 2026 U.S. Senate and House elections. It highlights a decline in Democratic leadership’s commitment to tackling corruption in Louisiana. The overview notes that while 14 candidates scored an A, four candidates in Louisiana Democratic leadership positions failed the corruption test.

internal link

This corruption perception index (CPI) focuses on the Louisiana Democratic candidates for U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives for the 2026 elections. M2Q (Motion to Quash LLC) uses the CPI to measure how corrupt candidates are perceived to be, according to experts. Presently, the CPI is the most widely used corruption ranking in the world.

According to the CPI, we’re seeing a decline in Louisiana Democratic leadership to tackle corruption. Specifically, some DPEC leaders persistently try to prevent journalists and whistleblowers from challenging abuses of power. Thus, reducing transparency and accountability. Standing against corruption in Louisiana is hard to achieve, but we won’t give up- and you shouldn’t either!

CPI for Democratic Candidates Overview

This overview highlights where the Louisiana Democratic party is lacking by exposing networks that allow corruption. The average CPI score is a B (85%). While 14 candidates have scored A for their corruption levels, 4 candidates in leadership positions failed. They have stayed stagnant or got worse. One candidate scored a B.

CPI for Democratic candidates decorative image
Democrat candidates U.S. Senate, U.S. House 2026
Corruption Score is based on three data sources.
5 total points possible for each one.
Data SourceMoney IssuedMoney ReceivedDisclosures/ conflicts
5 total points possible for each one555
Total (cumulative):15
Candidate AverageB85%5.03.84.0
Nick AlbaresA100%555
Gary CrockettA100%555
Jamie DavisF56%51.42
Lauren JewettF56%51.42
Jim LongA100%555
Troy Carter SrF53%503
Renada CollinsA97%4.854.8
John DayB80%552
Tia LeBrunA100%555
Caleb WalkerA93%554
Conrad CableA100%555
Matt GromlichA100%555
Jessee FleenorA100%555
Larry FoyA100%555
Lindsay GarciaA100%555
Dan McKayA100%555
Tania NymanA100%555
Cleo FieldsF33%500

M2Q offers data driven insights on corruption. In particular, we work toward systematic change in anti-corruption. We generally focus on issues with the greatest impact on Louisiana citizens. Additionally, we hold the powerful to account for the common good and build coalitions to change the status quo.

How is the CPI measured? 

The CPI index ranks candidates on a scale from 100 (very clean) to 0 (highly corrupt). For consistency, the total scores were based on these three principles:

  1. Campaign contributions issued (5 points)
  2. Campaign contributions received (5 points)
  3. Disclosures/conflicts of interest (5 points)

Only when candidates scored 15 for the whole package did they score 100 percent. 

Campaigns are dynamic, so we welcome your feedback. If you see a candidate’s position has changed, send us an email to info@motiontoquash.org with the new information.

Recognized by the NWC, Tracie Burke is author of Motion to Quash. M2Q supports the Whistleblower Protection Act. If you would like to support journalism in the public interest, click here to donate. Motion to Quash ISSN 2644-1594 is the copyrighted property of Motion to Quash LLC .

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

external link
Dr. Frederick Graves d/b/a Jurisdictionary authorized this ad.

$500 can get you two banners for an entire month. This includes ads across the M2Q website using both branding and call-to-action. Click here to buy ads or use the QR code. Thank you!

M2Q Corruption Index: Analysis of Jefferson Parish 2025 Candidates

M2Q Corruption Index

The Motion to Quash (M2Q) Corruption Index collects data from multiple sources to produces a corruption perception score.*

M2Q Corruption Score decorative image

Source Data

M2Q captured expert assessments of various public sector corruption practices. At length, this includes bribery and misuse of public funds. Additionally, it involves abuse of public office for personal gain, nepotism in civil service, and state capture. 

Then, M2Q scrupulously took into account 3 different assessments from 22 political candidates in Jefferson Parish. Half are unopposed.

M2Q Corruption inex decorative image

 Corruption Perception Overview

Generally, the average corruption perception score for Jefferson Parish candidates is C (71%). Overall, fourteen candidates scored A, four candidates scored F, and two scored D. Only one scored B and only one scored C. 

The M2Q corruption perception score is a powerful representation of the stand against corruption in Jefferson Parish. It helpfully serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and honesty in our political system.

Additionally, the scorecards offer precise and reliable judgment of campaign finance abuse. They give sound judgment particularly for those interested in elections and the stand against corruption.

*Includes contributions from gaming interests, pharmaceuticals, conflicts, or any entity that has received federal money in the form of contracts, grants, loans, or other financial assistance. Candidates are not penalized for funding their own campaigns.

Click the name to view the folder for each candidate

Jefferson Parish 2025
Candidate AverageC71%
Timothy Kerner JrF53%
Andrea ManuelA100%
Ricky TempletD60%
Belinda ConstantF47%
Robert E. Billiot SrC70%
Brett LawsonF53%
Dwayne MunchF53%
Wayne RauA100%
Rudy SmithA93%
Maggie CampbellA100%
Jason LeBlancA100%
Johnny ShaddingerA93%
Mike HinyubD67%
Tim MatherneA100%
Johnny Nobles JrA93%
Mark MillerB87%
Lisa ValenceA100%
Bobby BlackA100%
Randy CarrA93%
Bobby UtleyA93%
Bobby BonvillianA100%
Larry WarinoA97%

Campaign finance reports were obtained from the Louisiana Ethics Board website. Federal Award profiles were found at usaspending.gov

M2Q corruption Index external link usa spending

Pandemic Oversight

The U.S. Government continues to pursue a quiet but active campaign against Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) recipients they believe committed fraud. The government is expected to continue to pursue criminal charges, with a focus on civil False Claims Act cases.

How is corruption perception measured? 

Historically, Motion to Quash publishes the corruption scores before elections. It ranks candidates on a scale from 100 (very clean) to 0 (highly corrupt). For consistency, we base the total scores on these three principles:

  1. Campaign contributions issued (5 points)
  2. Campaign contributions received (5 points)
  3. Disclosures/conflicts of interest (5 points)

Only when candidates earn 15 points for the whole package do they score 100 percent. 

Campaigns are dynamic. We welcome your feedback. If you see a candidate’s position has changed, send us an email to info@motiontoquash.org with the new information.

Recognized by the NWC, Tracie Burke is author of Motion to Quash. M2Q supports the Whistleblower Protection Act. If you would like to support journalism in the public interest, click here to donate. Motion to Quash ISSN 2644-1594 is the copyrighted property of Motion to Quash LLC .

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

external link
This ad is authorized by by Dr. Frederick Graves d/b/a Jurisdictionary